Center for Media Justice home of the Media Action Grassroots Network

Civil Rights, Self-Representation, and the Fight for Open and Neutral Online Networks


Two weeks ago, the Center for Media Justice brought together a coalition of national media groups working on racial justice issues including the Media Action Grassroots Network, Color of Change, the Media Democracy Coalition,, Unity Journalists of Color, the National Hispanic Journalists Association, Center of Community Change, and with tremendous support from Joe Torres of Free Press, to meet with DC beltway civil rights groups One Economy, the Urban League, and the National Council of La Raza (NCLR) –all members of the Broadband Opportunity Coalition– to discuss the issue of open and neutral online networks and the network neutrality rules being considered by Congress right now.

News stories and blogs were saying that the civil rights community opposed network neutrality, which I found hard to believe. But there the telecom companies were, touting these open letters to Congress and the FCC from civil rights groups claiming that network neutrality was just a set of “burdensome regulations” that would distract from the “real issue” of closing the digital divide. Telecom companies threatened to disinvest in poor communities if they were held to any regulatory standards. There were the 72 members of the Democratic Party who signed on to these letters. Members of the media reform community shot back that the civil rights groups were bought out by big media. It was, as my cousins would call it, a hot mess. Since the whole point of network neutrality rules is to ensure open communication and self-representation with no corporate gatekeepers, I decided it was time to stop listening to the Telcos’ version and initiate face-to-face communication between the beltway and national civil rights communities. In the meetings, our coalition was delighted to discover that the beltway civil rights groups were NOT opposed network neutrality, and that they were as surprised and disturbed as we were to find that their position had been so incorrectly portrayed. The leaders we met with appeared inspired to hear that there were hundreds of local and national civil rights groups in adamant support of strong network neutrality rules, and asked us to hold them to their highest standard and represent the communities they serve.

In each meeting, the representatives we spoke to said they never intended to portray the issue as one they were against, and one shared that it was absurd for anyone in the civil rights community to oppose network neutrality. They also made it clear that in the wake of a conservative agenda to shrink government and decrease public investment in our communities, there is a long history of investment by Telecommunications companies in national civil rights groups and in communities of color. So when companies like Verizon or ATT frame an issue, they are trusted and believed.

Now, that made sense to me. In a society marked by media systems that maintain and echo the interests of the dominant group, it’s sound business and political strategy for telecommunications companies to invest in subordinated communities. While communities of color have always had a dog in the media reform fight, there are competing interests and real challenges to corporate investment in our communities. Think on that for a good long while. In the meantime, I mean, has democracy been working well for you recently? Feel like you have a real say in the policy debates on universal health care, climate change, comprehensive immigration reform, public education, or juvenile and criminal justice? Is your community adequately and fairly represented on broadcast and print news? Big companies making easy for you to share and sell your independent art and music? If you’re poor, a person of color, a woman, a member of the queer community, a progressive, a journalist, an independent artist, or simply not one of the few large telecommunications companies lobbying Congress to limit or eliminate network neutrality rules- your answer is probably, and emphatically NO.

As articulated in CMJ’s new one pager on network neutrality and racial justice, open and neutral online networks are a partial antidote to the exclusion and misrepresentation these communities face in traditional media. The fight to secure open and neutral online networks is a fight for self-representation. It’s a racial and economic justice fight. It’s a strategy for economic independence. With open and neutral online networks, communities pushed furthest to the margins by traditional media have a chance to speak powerfully for themselves. Finally. So it makes no sense that anyone from these communities would oppose making network neutrality principles law. These principles are the reason the Internet has become such a serious force for communication, connection, and change for us all in the last two decades. When you strip away all the technological mumbo jumbo, all network neutrality is, are a set of rules that forbid Internet service providers (ISPs) to block, discriminate against, or deter Internet users from accessing online content and applications of their choice—such as e-newsletters, blogs, social networking sites, online videos, podcasts and smart-phone apps. It’s strange that anyone who wants their community to have the right to represent themselves online would advocate for anything but the strongest possible protections.

Still, telecommunications companies like Verizon, ATT, and others claimed that open and neutral networks would threaten digital inclusion, decrease their ability to invest in communities of color and poor communities, and violate their right to manage their networks as they saw fit. They said the civil rights community and the Democratic Party agreed with that. Conspiracy plot? I think not.

It is the rational outcome of big business to attempt to make as much money as possible. The mega-merger between NBC and Comcast is an example of that. If these telecom giants can control the online video market, as well as cable, we’re talking BIG MONEY and serious threats to free speech and representation. Comcast already makes an 80% profit. “It’s not that network owners are secretly plotting to stifle free speech. But they have an undeniable, rational interest in creating a pay-for-play model for the treatment of communication on the Internet. Commercial Web sites that pay will get speed and quality, and the noncommercial uses of the Net [like skype, public access media, your favorite movie site] will be collateral damage—relegated to the slow lane. It’s not necessarily that they want to block our speech for political reasons. It’s that our speech is not important to them because it’s not going to make them money.” It’s a proven fact that ISP’s CAN manage complicated networks with different and competing technological needs without discriminating or blocking content- but they might not make as much money. It is a historical fact that if they can make big profits from a discriminatory pay-for-play model- they might do it, and we’d be faced with the same media problems we see in broadcast and print. Can anyone say Fox News? Radio Payola? Cable? That’s why we need the strongest rules possible.

Network neutrality rules threaten big media profits, because they put people and the public interest over corporate interests. It’s that simple. Thank goodness our national civil rights community didn’t fall for the okey doke. Unfortunately, the media framed the fight as one with white media reform groups who don’t understand communities of color on one side, and civil rights organizations who don’t understand media policy on the other. See… this is why we need communication without corporate gatekeepers, because, as per usual, they got the story wrong.

The meetings showed me that the civil rights community understands and wants open networks. The groups we met with were happy to meet, inspired by the connection, and committed to being clear that they did NOT oppose network neutrality. We should support them as they clarify their position. We all have real questions about “reasonable network management” and the legal definition for “non-discrimination” online, and we deserve real answers. Media reform groups whose purpose is to protect the public interest have real expertise on these issues, and they should provide answers to those questions in the clearest way possible. What’s true is that the media reform community needs to build deep alliances with the civil rights and racial justice community that is not only short-term and tactical but long-term and strategic. It will take trusted national partners in the field like the Center for Media Justice, the Applied Research Center, the Praxis Project, the Center for Rural Strategies, Native Public Media, the Media Democracy Coalition, and others to build a powerful media justice agenda and practices in policy advocacy that support bridge building. Through these initial meetings with the civil rights community, we built new alliances, expanded the base of people who care about and engage with media policy change, and forged a new vision together for what that change should look like.

I learned that in order to protect democracy, transform racism, and represent ourselves in the media- national progressive civil rights organizations have a significant role to play in media policy change because they have the scale to make significant change, while media reform groups have incisive expertise on the policy issues. Civil rights groups and media reform groups need to move a media policy agenda for racial and economic justice TOGETHER, as defined fundamentally by regional grassroots organizations like the member organizations of the Media Action Grassroots Network– who represent and work most closely with those pushed furthest to the margins. That’s my two cents. What do you think?

About the Author


  1. Carl says:

    Under many circumstance, all of us are troubled by many problems. There seem to be quite a lot of trials and tribulations people are under these days, and it is no surprise that more individuals have not uncovered the healing and soothing benefits that Italian Art can give. For many people, doing almost everything perfect is not really enough to rescue their life from the emotional traps that the problems in life can make. You will find there’s psychological phenomenon that a majority of individuals are usually completely ignorant of.

  2. deexu says:

    wedding dresses,wedding gowns,bride dresses,bridesmaids dresses,evening dresses,bridal gowns,
    flower girl dresses.
    Evening Dresses
    wedding Dresses
    cheap wedding dresses
    Prom Dresses: Find Online fashionable prom dresses,homecoming dresses from top USA prom gowns designers,
    Evening dresses, sexy Tops , casual dress ,sexy
    cheap prom prom dresses
    Elegant couture designer evening gowns, sexy dresses, inexpensive on sale prom dresses,
    evening dresses
    Nationwide bridal salon offers bridal and wedding gowns, bridesmaid dresses,
    flower girl dresses, tuxedos, and other special occasion apparel. Site includes a bridal
    links london
    links of london
    prom dresses

  3. queenying says:

    Evening dresses
    With more 1000 Designer dresses,we supply Evening Dresses,Custom Dresses,formal gowns,cocktail dresses with wholesale price
    prom dresses
    Dresses, evening, cocktail, prom dresses, formal gowns from dresseslife. Homecoming dresses and bridesmaid
    Graduation Dresses
    Looking For discount Balenciaga handbags? The store online sells the Balenciaga bags.
    Welcome to visit and buy Balenciaga handbags. we offer Balenciaga Handbags,Balenciaga
    Balenciaga Handbags
    Balenciaga sale

  4. qinqin says:


    There is a saying in Japan — Japanese porn actress to the top of a military. The reason is Japan's sex industry accounts for 1% of gross domestic product, is exactly the defense budget ceiling. In recent years, this "army" began to accelerate out of the country and in neighboring countries, Europe and the United States and even Islamic conquering a city. April 11, a Japanese had been "out of the shadows" of the creation of micro-known AV Actress Bo, her fans about 37 people per minute explosion in the rate, from a few hundred to a million people quickly. Currently, the number had exceeded 1.5 million fans. According to reports, which people have of her fans, of which there are Chinese people, with the Japanese market saturation, Japan's sex industry turned to look overseas。See this report, I feel sad for a few days ago China's Qinghai earthquake, are there many compatriots in distress endured, but you get these unsightly in this culture, as well as the Chinese fans. In fact, there are many cultures, such as links of london is one of a culture, Links of London Chain is a big international brands, is a better choice of people of various strata, and its ingenious design and outstanding personality, unique, Whether you want to wear their own clothes and fashion, also attended the light ball and party, or do you want to give someone else a gift, is the best choice .Maybe you do not believe in the magic of links of london jewellery, but it really is true, or maybe you are wearing the links charms, 2010 years of links of london jewelry has a good new models out, Do you want to see ? Kinds of styles of jewelry, the change kind of mood. To give a love, God bless you!

  5. qrs521 says:

    Women in summer would like to become beautiful. Everything can grab other’s eyes is their best friends.Products make them beauty and confident is their favourite. Look in the street,you can see many different types of make up to show women’s personality.

    Welcome to the shop, the following is our products, free shipping.

    Soccer Shoes Cheap Soccer Shoes Nike Soccer Shoes Adidas Soccer Shoes Nike Soccer Shoes sale Adidas Soccer Shoes sale MBT MBT shoes MBT Men shoes MBT Women shoes MBT Chapa Chapa GTX MBT Chapa GTX MBT Changa Women UGG Women UGG boots ugg boots cardy ugg women ugg cardy boots Nike Air Nike Air Max Nike Air Max Shoes Nike Dunk Nike Dunk SB Nike Dunk SB Shoes Nike Shox Nike Shox Shoes Timberland Timberland sale Timberland boots Timberland boots online Timberland on sale New timberland boots Women Bags Women Bags Sale Women Handbags Women Handbags Sale Women New Bags Cheap Bags Cheap Bags On Sale UGG UGG boots UGG boots short Short ugg Short ugg boots Ugg boots tall New women bags New women bags sale New women bags sale online Louis Vuitton Handbags Gucci bags hair straighteners hair straighteners sales GHD straighteners GHD straighteners sales CHI iron CHI iron sales BOSE headphones discount cheap CHI iron Nike Nike Shoes Nike Shoes Sale Nike running Nike running shoes Nike trainers Nike trainers shoes Timberland boots Timberland boots sale Timberland boot Timberland boot sale Timberland boots cheap Men timberlands

    Those who want to become most beautiful in the world should try them. Just ones can make you different. Girls who want to grab your boyfriends’s heart is necessary to use them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Website by Radish Lab.