In This Section
Archives
Blogroll
- Adrienne Maree: The Luscious Satyagraha
- Afro-Netizen
- Alternet
- Aurora Levins Morales
- Can't Stop Won't Stop
- Colorlines
- Davey D's Hip Hop Corner
- Desplazado
- Digital Smoke Signals
- Edge of Sports
- El Grito
- Feministing
- Free Press
- Imagine 2050
- Institute for Public Accuracy
- Jack and Jill Politics
- Jobs with Justice Blog
- Katrina Information Network
- Media Matters
- Organizing Upgrade
- PoliticalPoet
- PR Watch
- PTP Reverb
- RaceWire
- Racialicious
- SmartMeme
- SWOPblogger
- The Huffington Post
- WIMN'S Voices
- Wired Latinos
Should Latinos Support the AT&T Merger?

As leaders of some civil rights groups resign and withdraw their legal filings opposing the AT&T merger and network neutrality under suspicion of trading political support for the promise of jobs and donations- other national civil and human rights organizations are taking a closer look at the role big media companies play in their organizations and communities.
Latino organizations represent the fastest growing consumer base for wireless technologies- and they have a difficult choice to make. Can they afford to examine the merger on its merits, and oppose it if they find it harmful?
Despite clear evidence that the AT&T merger is the worst way to expand access, would eliminate jobs, raise prices, and harm workers who aren’t lucky enough to be unionized- some civil rights groups have still given it a thumbs up. But some Latino organizations I know and respect are doing a damn good job making sure their communities are represented as the DOJ and the FCC decide if this merger is best for America.
Recently, the National Latino Congreso, a member of Latinos for Internet Freedom (LIF), sent a letter to AT&T asking tough, but good, questions about claims that the merger will bring access and employment to Latino communities. Rather than simply pointing fingers or turning a blind eye to the facts, NLC is doing what all Latino civil rights groups should- making AT&T answer to them instead of the other way around.
In a recent blog, another LIF member, the National Hispanic Media Coalition, said they were disappointed to hear of the merger- and pointed out that despite that 25% of Latinos are in poverty, they pay more for cell phones than any other demographic group. On average, they pay $104 per month.
These two leading Latino organizations oppose the merger of AT&T and T-mobile. What about you, what do you think? Will the replacement of a low-cost competitor (T-mobile) with a carrier that boasts expensive phones, a bad network, and control of more than 70% of the wireless market (AT&T) hurt or help Latino communities?
2 Responses to “Should Latinos Support the AT&T Merger?”
Leave a Reply
In this edition of VisionTalk, Saru Jayaraman talks about how Restaurant Opportunities Centers United (ROC United) are building a powerful movement to improve the working conditions and wages of the nation’s 10 million restaurant workers.


Great blog. Thanks for this, Mac!
Great blog and information. Let’s hope that there will be a groundswell of civil rights groups coming out publicly to question the merger…